Veritas News – Eco-Nazi part 3 – Agenda 21, Travel Management and Local Implementation

Veritas News Service Report

by Todd Stevens


Eco-Nazi, Pt.3

Click here for part 1

Click here for part 2

Agenda 21, Travel Management and Local Implementation

Agenda 21 can be directly traced back to two spectrums of the government strata that are involved in the projected future of global governance and world control. There is so much evidence and so many credible people who are trying to get the word out that you must only look for it through simple searches on the subject matter.

Look for:

Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, Wildland’s Project, Project for Global Biodiversity, Conservation Strategy, Biodiversity Assessment, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), Environmental Assessment Guidelines (a.k.a. DEIS or EIS reports), Travel Management Plans (which is were your participation can begin)

For some great talks on the subject matter there are audio series out there to be found at ( in the archives outlining exactly what Agenda 21 is and how you can fight back against it. Some of the more important are Allodial Titles and Land Patents, History of Property Rights series, and State Sovereignty series. Also, look for the coordination workbook, as it will be a working tool that you can carry with you in your fight. These will not only help in the way of your understanding of what Agenda 21 is but how to make you a proactive person in your area to help prevent local implementation. As you will see in this article and others they are right at your doorstep and the only way for them to succeed is if you let them in.

There will be a lot of words thrown around that sound good for people such as Sustainability, Conservation, Wildlife Protection etc, but in truth the real matter is a schism between Lockeian principles of private property and what Globalist would rather see.

What is it actually?

So what is Sustainable Development? The Sustainablists insist that society be transformed into feudal-like governance by making nature the central organizing principle for our economy and society. To achieve this, Sustainablist policy focuses on three components; global land use, global education, and global population control. Keep in mind that America is one of the only countries in the world based on the ideals of private property. But, private property is incompatible with the collectivist premise of

Sustainable Development

Quote from UN: If you doubt that, then consider this quote from the report of the 1976 UN’s Habitat I conference which said:  “Land …cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principle instrument of accumulation and concentration

of wealth, therefore, contributes to social injustice.”

What does John Locke say: “”The legislature acts against the trust reposed in them, when they endeavour to invade the property of the subject, and to make themselves, or any part of the community, masters, or arbitrary disposers of the lives, liberties or fortunes of the people”. (Second Treatise, Chapter 19)

Tom Deweese wrote:

Some officials try to pretend that Sustainable Development is just a local effort to protect the environment — just your local leaders putting together a local vision for the community. Then ask your local officials how it is possible that the exact language and tactics for implementation of Sustainable Development are being used in nearly every city around the globe from Lewiston, Maine to Singapore. Local indeed, Sustainable Development is the process by which America is being reorganized around a central

principle of state collectivism using the environment as bait

The best way to understand what Sustainable Development actually is can be found by discovering what is NOT sustainable.

According to the UN’s Biodiversity Assessment Report, items for our everyday lives that are NOT sustainable include: Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building fences, industry, single family homes, paved and tarred roads, logging activities, dams and reservoirs, power line construction, and economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment (capitalism, free markets).

Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the UN’s Rio Earth Summit in 1992 said, “…Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.”

If you haven’t gathered the big picture that this is all a huge land and water grab by the Department of Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Forest Service (NFS), National Parks Service (NPS), U.S. Forest Service (U.S.F.S), and Fish and Wildlife Service all working under U.N. implementation of Agenda 21. Then look up all of the agencies “…representatives who go to UNEP or the United Nations Environmental Program which was started back in 1973 by the UN General Council for Global Environmental implementation policies” (Deweese 1).

Also on the list of whom you should keep in mind are right at the starting floor of all the policies acting as None Governmental Organizations (NGO’s) are the Environmental Defense Fund, National Audubon Society, The Nature Conservancy, National Wildlife Federation, Zero Population growth, Planned Parenthood, the Sierra Club, the National Education Association, and hundreds more.

Local Implementation and Solution Oriented Mindset

The ways in which the plans are being brought about in this country are through our own acquiescence. With the Tenth Amendment on our side stating that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are Reserved to the States respectively, or to the People.” They have to go through us to get to the land and water that they are attempting to control, but if you do not participate you do not have a say in what is going on. This is why they have so many different agencies and NGO’s working on the project from above and down below. They are also working through the ICLEI to get local officials to do their bidding. How local? I mean even your local City Council and Boards of Supervisors. Take a moment to go to the ICLEI website and look up if you county and city are on the list because they probably are ( This is why it is so important that you make your own voice heard. They are flooding these officials with sustainability nonsense and providing for financial incentives to those that will go along with such plans.

Travel Management Plans

The big plan and implementation is under way in the Department of Agricultures Travel Management Plans. The Travel Management Plans came into effect with the Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations, under CFR 212, 251, 261, and 295.What the Travel Management Plans entail, according to them, is to restructure the travel access routes throughout all of the National Forest of the nation to be better suited for environmental protection under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) which will be enforced through the National Environmental Protection Agency and the National Forest Service. They will and have been attempting to shut down “roads” and trails to better protect the endangered species and “wet lands” in your local area. This is also, limiting the access of Off Highway Vehicles (OHV) and public vehicle access. They are also working in accordance to the Wildlands Project to make areas be “Environmentally” protected. This can be seen in the clearer sense in Wilderness areas, such as, Arizona, Texas, and New Mexico’s Wilderness areas where Border Patrol Agents could not go into the protected areas even in the pursuance of suspected drug traffickers under threat of Federal Laws where they could be possibly fined and imprisoned if they do so. This is also being seen in Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah where ranchers our encountering problems with grazing areas to move their cattle on because of proposed wilderness areas.

To find the Travel Management Plans going on in your local area you must go to the Federal Register and see if they are posting any public hearings on the issue of Travel Management for National and State Parks in your area. By law they have to post the upcoming events and public hearings to be had on the issue of their proposed Travel Management Plans. When wanting to get involved they will try to convince you that they have to protect the land for endangered species and wildlands, however, under NEPA the agencies have to comply with their own regulations that must take into account the human element which ask them to “achieve a balance between population and resource use which will permit high standards of living and a wide sharing of life’s amenities…” (42 U.S.C. section 4331 subsection (b) part 5 NEPA).  They cannot just account for the endangered species or the wet lands that they want to protect if there is a conflict with the human element in their plan. As stated in their own regulations “utilize a systematic, interdisciplinary approach which will insure the integrated use of the natural and social sciences and the environmental design arts in planning and in decision making which may have an impact on Man’s environment.” (U.S.C.A. section 4332 subsection (a) NEPA).

This is where the coordination process will start. Once you find the plans see how they will affect the area. Does it limit the access of fire department and law enforcement? Does it have an adverse affect on economics for Ranchers, Farmers, and Property owners? These and many other issues including states rights to water and property are all relevant in the case of the National Environmental Policy Act and most other environmental regulatory statues. Once you can establish what it is their plan is you can develop your own. Use all of the tools that have be provided for on the HOTT site, such as, Allodial Titles series, Property Rights series, and the Statehood series all of these being important in your understanding of jurisprudence and how to use it. This is one of those cases were the pen is mightier then the sword or the bullhorn. Yelling at some public official as they walk out of a restaurant or book store makes for a humorous youtube video but it will probably not do you much good and the person being verbally attacked is most likely laughing at you as he or she enters their bullet proof limousine. On the other hand if you can become adept at legalese, jurisprudence and the processes by which they use them against you, then you will most certainly become dangerous to those that wish to subvert our freedoms.

One example of the effect with the Travel Management Plans and Wildland’s projects they have been making attempts in shutting down major mining areas that will end up disrupting people’s lives and livelihood. Once such example is the Arizona Strip, were through the proposed wilderness areas they were attempting to shut down mining in the area. For those that are unaware “The Arizona Strip FO is located in northern Coconino and Mohave counties, Arizona, north of Grand Canyon National Park and contains 1,679,896 acres of BLM-administered lands, 170,165 acres of Arizona State Trust lands, and 130,962 acres of private land. The decisions in the Approved RMP only apply to the 1,679,896 acres of BLM-administered lands within the Arizona Strip FO.” (BLM Record of Decision 2008). The area is also one of the largest Uranium deposits in North America which can supply millions of pounds of uranium to United States nuclear reactors thus creating electricity and eliminating some dependence on foreign uranium. Recently Secretary of Interior Salazar has been attempting to remove public lands from mineral entry into the Arizona Strip. This despite the fact the mining areas were left out of the original Wilderness areas as described   “Commissioner Alan Gardner of Washington County, Utah and cochair of the five county group, said “Congress left the “Arizona Strip” open to uranium mining when it established the Arizona and Utah wildernesses. The wilderness acts specifically left the “Strip” available for continuation of uranium mining. That was a specific part of the settlement that Congress insisted on before it would pass the Acts. So, the Secretary is trying to end-run the law that Congress passed.” (quoted in Trademark press release). This is happening despite the fact that we import 90% of our uranium from foreign countries. This is yet another egregious attempt by the Obama administration to make themselves above their own rules. Not to worry though I have it on good authority that groups in Northern Arizona and Southern Utah are working diligently to disrupt such attempts.

Aside from the larger implementations that are going on it would be wise to also become associated with all of your local officials. If you are not aware of who you Mayor, City Council, and Board of Supervisors are it would be wise to start becoming aware of these people as they too are also making decisions that will affect Agenda 21 implementation. It is much easier to get rid of your Mayors and Council members then it is to get rid of Senators and Congressmen. As an example, in my local area the Board of Supervisors has just been attempting to initiate the Initial Study and Assessment Guidelines or the ISAG guidelines. In these ISAG guidelines it requires that all types of industrial activities and residential growth have to go through these initial studies and assessment before they can make any moves towards development. They also were attempting to set aside environmental protected wetlands that were nothing more then small water areas that truly don’t need protecting.  The Initial Study Assessment Guidelines (ISAG) will cover many issues such as restrictive covenant, element occurrence, linkage/Wildlife Movement Corridors and Candidate Species. Of these four topics one of the most obviously disturbing is the Linkage/Wildlife Movement Corridors. When seeing the Agenda 21 mapping system you will notice that they have to restrict access to the National parks and they also need linkage/corridor systems to connect all of these and have protection for animal movement.

This is described by the Wildlands Network website as “Just as humans use highways that span state and national boundaries for many essential purposes, wildlife needs Wild ways to travel the distances required to find a mate, to breed and to keep genetic variability strong.” There are people now who are aware of the adverse effects of these laws which are making moves to eliminate them. Some for the reason that they just want to be able to have a business open without going through this extra burdensome process. Others are against it for their agricultural and farming reasons. Not all of them see it as a big Agenda 21 take over but that doesn’t matter as long as they are willing to put in the effort to stop it their personal reasons don’t make much of a difference.

Another example of the local implementations is through state laws such as Renewable energy guidelines and cap and trade guidelines. A recent example of this is when the Sierra Club was calling on the governor Jerry Brown in California to reevaluate the Cap and Trade regulations that were occurring, because as the Sierra Club stated the old regulations that former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger “has major flaws in it that will limit the effectiveness of curbing carbon emissions and generate the flow of green jobs in accordance with the requirements of AB 32” ( Von Oot (Sacramento Bee) 1). With a bit of digging you can find out that acts like this usually fall under some type of Code in your local legislature that provide for tools for the public use, such is the case with AB 32 were I discovered that:

Accordingly the act falls under the Air Resource Boards final Resolution that was given on December 16, 2010. (under Resolution 10-42; agenda item #: 10-11-1) This act falls under the Global Warming’s Solution Act of 2006 AB 32: chapter 448, statues of 2006, Health and Safety Code subsection 38500 et seq.

In the Air Resource Boards final Resolution pg. 1 paragraph 3 it states:

Whereas to Health and Safety Code, which express the Legislation intent that Air Resource Board COORDINATE with state agencies

In California Health and Safety Code subsection 38501 (f) it states:

It is the intent of the legislature that the State Air Resource Board COORDINATE with state agencies, as well as, consult with environmental justice community, Industrial Sector, Business Groups, academic institutions, environmental organizations, and other stakeholders in implementing this division.

Also in California Health and Safety Code subsection 38501 (i) it states:

It is the intent of the Legislature that the climate Action Team established by the Governor to COORDINATE the efforts set forth under Executive Order S-3-05, continue its role in COORDINATING overall climate policy.

Executive Order S-3-5 states in section 2:

That the California Environmental Protection Agency (secretary) shall coordinate oversight of the efforts made to meet the targets with: Secretary of Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, Secretary of the Department of Food and Agriculture, Secretary of Resource Agency, Chairperson of the Air Resource Board, Chairperson of the Energy Commission, and the President of the Utilities Commission.

Not only does Executive Order of the State Governor require coordination with the CEPA secretary but as the CEPA falls under NEPA coordination is required at all levels see:

42 U.S.C. 4331 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) subsections (a), (b) specifically.

For those who have never heard of Coordination or would like a quick review, it is defined in California Native Plant Society v. City of Rancho Cordova, 172 Cal. App. 4Th 603, 91 Cal. Rpr. 3rd. 571 (Third App. Dist. 2009) only equal parties coordinate. In enacting your coordination right your local government, meaning tax collecting agency, is at an even table with the agency attempting to enact any law, regulation, or rule and they shall coordinate with the party that is enacting; they shall not they may.

This meaning any plan set forth must be considered before implementation of the project any no consideration is a violation of their own State and Federal rules and regulations.

California Health and Safety Code 38562 subsection (g) also requires that:

they must do a public workshop allowing for public comment on the plan and they must post the plans for these periods on either the federal register or the state register depending on the implementation.

In the case of this California specific action it should be posted through your local official’s office or through the Capital in Sacramento.

It is definite that if you do not act on these rights the environmental groups will and they have for a number of years.

The description of the goals and ends of this legislation is presented in California Health and Safety Code 38562 subsection (a):

On or before January 1st 2011 the state board shall adopt greenhouse gas emissions limits and emissions reduction measures by regulation to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and COST-EFFECTIVE reductions in greenhouse emissions. These measures are to be enacted by January 1st, 2012

Another one of the most advantageous tools that can be used when getting involved is the Data Quality Act, which is also sometimes known as the Information Quality Act. The DQA basically states that “The DQA requires federal agencies to issue information quality guidelines ensuring the quality, utility, objectivity and integrity of information that they disseminate and provide mechanisms for affected persons to correct such information. It is important for natural resources and environmental attorneys to be aware of this law in the event that a client has an interest in filing a petition with an agency to challenge the quality of information it has used or disseminated” (Bisong 1). Whenever Federal agencies are moving in to do some type of action you can petition and call in the Data Quality Act and they must show you the data used to make their decisions. If they don’t give it to you they are in violation. If they used unreliable sources for their date you can challenge them on it. One of the greatest things about the DQA is that individuals can use it you do not have to be a part of any agency or local government.

These types of guidelines and local laws are going on throughout the country but the only thing that is needed for them to get passed is for us not to pay attention. When you start to see the big picture and how it is being implemented locally and nationally it becomes easier to call it for what it is. This is another step towards draconian control that is being done by the people’s acquiescence. It does not have to be that way though. By finding out who are your local officials are and getting them voted out of office if you have to you can take back local control of your area. You do not have to stop everything yourself but we can all do are part in whatever capacity that may be. Some people are good at reading through long pieces of legislation. Others are good speakers and group organizers. Whatever it is that you feel more comfortable and better at you should do because it will all contribute to regaining control of the country that should have never been lost in the first place. They expect the sheeple to be asleep and roll over, don’t be what they expect.

Original artikel:

Dit bericht is geplaatst in Veritas Nieuws Service met de tags . Bookmark de permalink.