Veritas News – THE CULT OF ZION – Pt. 2 – British Israelism/Christian Identity, Mormonism, and the Bolsheviks

 Click here for part 1

Veritas News Service Report

by: Todd Stevens



Pt. 2 –

British Israelism/Christian Identity, Mormonism, and the Bolsheviks

This article is one of a series in which I never intended to write from the beginning and one in which was always inescapably to not write. As I looked for the font of VERITAS and realized that there was none I also realized that there would be no victory in such writing. There is no truth in such a grey area of deception as the one we find ourselves in. There is only truth within the individual, of which, I wish to find.

I am not a racist and am not an anti-Semite. My family is built of many different races, as many of the families that you find in America. I hold no affinity with ideologies that express superiority to one race or the other, nor do I sympathize with Aryan or any other race ideology. I find them repugnant to the core and only wish to see a free thinking individualized state emerge from the depths of collectivism. With that said I charge that Zionism and Christian ideology with Zionist views are but another furtherance of the youth revolutionary ideologies that threaten the world for their own state, of which I have concluded falls under the umbrella of British Israelism or what has also been referred to as the Christian Identity movement. There is no other conclusion to be met when faced with the overwhelming evidence that the U.S. and Britain support, finance, and succumb to the will of Israel in their cries, whimpers, and outright demanding of our support. As an American I am not predisposed to helping the state of Israel. As a Christian it is not my job to make biblical prophecy fulfilled. Furthermore, as a free thinking individual it is not my job to sit idly by while a state becomes despotic and outright terroristic to people, and when my “tax payer” dollars go to fund such a state.

This is the Cult of Zion.

First a quote to remember:

Woe to those who draw sin along with cords of deceit,

and wickedness as with cart ropes,

to those who say “Let God hurry,

Let him hasten his work.

So we may see it.

Let it approach,

let the plan of the Holy One of Israel come,

so we may know it.”

–  ISAIAH 5:18-19

In understanding the history that will be reported on it is necessary to introduce you to the end in which will be made by the conclusion of these articles. British/American Israelism is a key influence to the chain of events that transpired in the course of WW1 and WW2. Although, it is not the reasoning in its entirety, it is a main goal that was being pushed in the events that unfolded. It is not the goal of this article to re-write history but rather to bring forth truth that has been suppressed for a number of years regarding the issue of the first and second World Wars. There have been a number of great writings on the subject matter and this by no means is the only or the best. It is my attempt to approach it in a rather unsavory and not well travelled road that might make it a unique article in respect to the already well gathered amount of information that has been put forth on the subject matter at hand.

It must be stated quite clearly that the idea of a state of Israel was already presupposed before even the 20th century and in the mid 19th century there was a movement among not Jews but Anglo-Saxon Oligarchs to make such a state made. This movement began with the shady beginnings that some attempt to trace back to Sir John Dee and the Elizabethan period; others suppose it came about through Sir Francis Drake and his naming of England as “Israel” or “New Jerusalem.” The most factual evidence is recorded in the first public statement regarding British Israelism by Richard Brothers a Royal Navel officer who fought against America in the Revolutionary War. In his statement he claimed that England was not only a theoretical Israel but that the peoples of England were descendents of the 10 lost tribes of Israel (which biblically were never lost).[1] Rightfully, he would soon after be placed into an insane asylum and in my opinion John Hagee, Pat Robertson, Glen Beck, and any other dispensationalist of our time could also be sent there. Moving on though, in 1840 this idea would again be picked up by John Nelson Darby. Darby’s theories would come to be called “premillenial Dispansationalism” and would be outlined in three subsequent ideas of the coming rapture that stated “1) the millennial Kingdom of Christ will sweep away all civilization, and the only people saved will be a tiny group of elect who will be raptured physically into the new kingdom; 2) the evil power in the world is “Gog,” as identified in Ezekiel, who will sweep down on Israel and begin the end days—Darby then confidently identified Gog as Russia; and 3) the End will come only when the Scripture is fulfilled and the Jews return to Israel and rebuild the Temple.”[2]

I would hope that this is starting to paint a picture as to why British Oligarchy would have a vested interest in the return of the Jews to Israel. Another quite cynical note to be made regarding their initial beliefs is that they did not regard those inhabitants of Palestine or those who practice the Hebrew traditions as being Jews. They actually consider the people of England the real descendents of the Tribes and this is where you might get some of these ridiculous theories, such as the Jews we know today are actually decedents of Khazars. This is in no way true. The people that we know today are real Jews and are descendents of a Hebrew origin.

This idea would come about in 1840 when John Wilson would pick up on John Nelson Darby’s views and publish Lectures on our Israelitish Origins also claiming that the true descendents migrated to England and Germany and the racial inferiors stayed behind in Judah and Palestine. This would come to a climax when also in 1840 Secretary Lord Palmerston unofficially committed England to Zionism. Officially it would become policy to bring Palestine back into a Jewish State under the guardianship of Great Britain. This would create a protectorate in the Levant to block any encroaching enemy advancement.[3] The movement would move forward in the coming years setting up the British influence on its people, as well as, spreading to the churches of American through pamphlets and other dispensationalist writings setting up a movement that would soon come to fruition in the coming century of Revolution and War. The British would move to fully establish their position and intentions when “The Crown’s “case officer” for this project was Anthony Ashley Cooper, the Seventh Earl Shaftesbury, a “pious” oligarch who combined aspects of both the Darbyites and Israelism. The British Israelites, cleaned them up for general consumption, and became the leading spoke man for a plan to resettle Jews back in Israel. Shaftesbury’s “High Church” version of British Israelism, as well as the various “Low Church” versions, grew through the 19th century. Queen Victoria’s, daughter, Princess Alice, became a patroness of the movement in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.” In 1862, the Prince of Wales and future King Edward VII made a tour of the Holy Land; the first English Royal set foot there since 1270. In 1865, Shaftesbury’s efforts came to fruition with the founding of the Palestine Exploration Fund (PEF). Under the official patronage of the Queen, the PEF brought together funding from the Rothschild’s and the United Grand Lodge of Freemasons; membership ranged from oligarchs to apocalyptic crazies.”[4] This Exploration Fund has not gone away and is still in full operation leaving no doubt that the ideas and the beliefs held have not gone away either.

Another “religion” that would begin to start around this time would be Mormonism, also known as Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Despite the fact that this particular “religion” would not truly gain monetary power until in the 20th century it would be appropriate to outline some the earliest beliefs of the “religion” for usage that will come together in later articles. The particular beliefs that are being referred to are the ones that coincide with these already held beliefs that were being put forth through “premillenial dispensationalism.” The Book of Mormon outlines the exact same ideas of the ten lost tribes being found, but unlike English dispensationalism LDS Mormons believe the lost tribes descended to America. They believe that they are the true Jewish decedents and that it is them not the Jews that will rebuild the Temple. Pray tell where will this temple be built? “We believe in the literal gathering of Israel and in the restoration of the Ten Tribes; that Zion (the New Jerusalem) will be built upon the American continent; that Christ will reign personally upon the earth; and, that the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory. (PGP, A FAITH :10) They are even nice enough to say exactly where this temple will be built “After Zion is built in Jackson County (Missouri), and after the Temple is built upon that spot of ground where the corner stone was laid in 1831; after the glory of God in the form of a cloud by day shall rest upon that Temple, and by night the shining of a flaming fire that will fill the whole heavens round about; after every, dwelling place upon Mount Zion shall be clothed upon as with a pillar of fire by night, and a cloud by day, about that period of time, the ten tribes will be heard of, away in the north, a great company, (JD, O PRATT 18:68)

Now if this isn’t weird enough, the lead up to the Temple being built does not exactly paint a pretty picture for those that are not of this faith. Leading up to the building of the temple The Book of Mormon states that “Israel will make haste against those that destroy and persecute Israel. All these gather themselves together. The waste places that were left desolate after destructions in the land will then be inhabited by Israel. Joseph Smith said, “A scene of bloodshed unlike any in the history of this nation, pestilence, hail, famine, and earthquakes will sweep the wicked off the land BEFORE the return of the lost tribes.” This destruction will prepare the way for the return of the Lost Tribes. The cities will still be “too narrow” or cramped to contain the Lost Tribes.

The Ten Tribes will outnumber the saints. Israel (Mormon’s) will inhabit the homes of the Gentiles (Christians/Jews/Muslims) in the cities that have been left desolate by calamities (HC 1:315).

At that day when the wrath of God is poured out upon the great and abominable church of all the earth, then the work of the Father will commence in fulfilling His covenants with Israel. (Gathering Israel, 3 Nephi 21:26).

Now this outline of thought should be remembered as we move forward into the 20th century and will be covered at length in further installments. For now it is necessary to understand when Christian, Zionist, and Mormon dispensationalist speak of the rebuilding of the Temple they do not have the good will of the Jewish people or any other belief in mind because they are the true Israel and Zion. The proverbial Temple, whether spiritual or physical, will only be created through them. With that in mind we will move off the subject of ideologies and into the history that occurred during the late 19th and early 20th century, with regards to Zionism and WWI, to better explain the movements that would come about leading up to our present day.

Zionism/the Bolsheviks and the Underlying Goals in the World Wars

When looking into the roles played by Jews in the Bolsheviks and Zionism interaction with the Nazi’s it would be quite easy to suppose that it was wholly a Jewish World Revolutionary attempt. This does not seem to fully bring together all of the movements that were going on at the time and I think it would be a mistake to assume that this was a wholly Jewish movement. These groups were being used to ends, of which, I do not believe they were fully cognizant. To look at them and condemn them would be just as easily done with American people and the policies and actions being done in their name.

In Theodor Herzl’s the Jewish State he outlines some quite prophetic happenings that would come to pass. In 1896 he wrote, regarding the Jews that “When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; and at the same time, when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse…

The Governments of all countries scourged by Anti-Semitism will be keenly interested in assisting us to obtain the sovereignty we want.”[5]

Herzl would even use this idea as a bargaining tool during the late 19th Century with negotiations that were being made with the Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany. Although later in World War II anti-Semitic sentiment would grow Kaiser Wilhelm was no Nazi. He would keep Jewish people from serving in the officer corps and civil foreign offices but he allowed for total economic freedoms within Germany to the Jewish community. With revolutionary actions beginning to take a real hold in Europe Kaiser Wilhelm saw that it as a real threat during the time and would give Herzl an audience as he represented the World Zionist Organization in Constantinople on October 19 1898. Among what would be discussed would be that “The WZO had no army, it could never seize the country on its own. Its only chance lay in getting a European power to pressure the Sultan on Zionism’s behalf. A Zionist colony would then be under the power’s protection and the Zionists would be its agents within the decomposing Ottoman realm.” It would also be offered that the Jewish community would take up any foreign debt that was held in the region to be occupied. Despite this offer in the meeting that would occur there was yet another intriguing offer that could be made to the Ottoman and German leadership of the time “Herzl had grasped that he had another bait that he could dangle before potential right-wing patrons: ‘I explained that we were taking the Jews away from the revolutionary parties”[6]

As, the movements of the early twentieth century would grow you would come to see what Herzl described as the “Revolutionary Proletariat” within the ranks of the Bolsheviks. Remembering also that within Great Britain British Israelism held sway, Winston Churchill would write of the Bolsheviks that the “Worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality.” He would continue on to say that “There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews and in some notable cases by Jewesses”[7]

This also being so in America you would see warnings by “David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”[8] Even in Jewish communities it would be claimed that this was true when “The Bolshevik Revolution,” declared a leading American Jewish community paper in 1920 “was largely the product of Jewish thinking, Jewish discontent, and Jewish effort to reconstruct.”[9]

In the Bolsheviks you have a movement disrupting the order of the time, despite the fact that crucial reforms and changes were being attempted by the Tsarist and his reformers namely through the “Stolypin Constitution” which offered civil rights to the peasantry of which accounted for 85% of the populace. To place things in better context it was also transforming essential property ownership. With these reforms Russia would see “Between 1907 and 1914, under the Stolypin land reform laws, 2,000,000 peasant families seceded from the village mir and became individual proprietors. All through the war the movement continued, so that by January 1, 1916, 6,200,000 peasant families, out of approximately 16,000,000 eligible, had made application for separation. Lenin saw the matter as a race with time between Stolypin’s reforms and the next upheaval.”[10]

Could this be a partial reason as to why the Tsar Nichols II was murdered in such a despicable fashion? In the dead of night with his whole family being gun down and his daughters being brutally stabbed with bayonets. This happened without even the show trials that were given to Charles I and King Louis XVI in the brutal revolutions that occurred in their respective countries. Then their bodies were burned to eliminate any of the evidence. The massacre would be covered up and denied by the Communist until later it would have to be admitted. It has been described of this murder that:

“The manner, in which the massacre was prepared and carried out, at first denied and then justified, has something uniquely odious about it, something that radically distinguishes it from previous acts of regicide and brands it as a prelude to twentieth-century mass murder.

Another historian, Ivor Benson, characterized the killing of the Romanov family as symbolic of the tragic fate of Russia and, indeed, of the entire West, in this century of unprecedented agony and conflict.

The murder of the Tsar and his family is all the more deplorable because, whatever his failings as a monarch, Nicholas II was, by all accounts, a personally decent, generous, humane and honorable man.”[11]

This would also be a good time to remember that the Bolsheviks had to be funded by someone. You do not create a revolution that needs guns, ammo, food, and especially the vast amounts of propaganda coming from the revolution without a fund giving it to you. This is especially the case when fighting a huge power that has full armies and munitions to defend itself. In 1917 Leon Trotsky was on his way back from New York into Russia to begin the revolution. It is reported that he had 10,000 from an unnamed German source and was travelling with his children and five other socialist revolutionaries, after a stay in New York for approximately three months. This was uncovered in Anthony C. Sutton’s book, “Wall Street and the Bolsheviks Revolution” and corroborated through Canadian de-classified documents that stated “According to these archives, Trotsky was removed by Canadian and British naval personnel from the S.S. Kristianiafjord at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on April 3, 1917, listed as a German prisoner of war.”[12] Other sources that would come to the aid of revolutions not only in Russia but in Panama and China would find a source of income through Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan, who at the time had an all-out industrial monopoly on oil, electrical companies, railroads, banking, and trust throughout the United States. Remembering that both of these men and the organizations they have had held deep family and ideological connections to the Rothschild’s and the Bank of London (see Rothschild’s Dynasty part 1 and 2).

Two of the examples mention, namely Panama and China, are described in Sutton’s book. It was shown that through a Wall Street law firmed named Sullivan and Cromwell these revolutions would gain funds and would come out in a Congressional hearing through Congressman Rainey, who put on record that “It is my contention that the representatives of this Government [United States] made possible the revolution on the Isthmus of Panama. That had it not been for the interference of this Government a successful revolution could not possibly have occurred, and I contend that this Government violated the treaty of 1846. I will be able to produce evidence to show that the declaration of independence which was promulgated in Panama on the 3rd day of November, 1903, was prepared right here in New York City and carried down there — prepared in the office of Wilson (sic) Nelson Cromwell ….” Interesting, New York was where Trotsky had just left and was heading back to Russia from, could it be that he had had a hand in the writing of this declaration? We shall see later. Unfortunately the list of funding for revolution does not stop there. It was also discovered that through similar funding Poncho Villa and the Mexican revolutionaries would also get financed. There would be government documents in Texas that would come through regarding the Mexican revolution. “The testimony of John A. Walls, district attorney of Brownsville, Texas, before the 1919 Fall Committee yielded documentary evidence of the link between Bolshevik interests in the United States, German activity, and the Carranza forces in Mexico. Consequently, the Carranza government, the first in the world with a Soviet-type constitution (which was written by Trotskyites), was a government with support on Wall Street.”[13]

These actions would further and continue into direct relations with Russian revolutionaries. Morgan-Rockefeller through Vanderlip and Guaranteed Trust Company and by way of Olof Aschberg, Swedish banker and head of the Nya Banken in

Stockholm, would set up direct loans to Russia through illegal telegram cables and through the loan in clear violation of international law. Olof Aschberg would come to be later known as the “Bolsheviks Banker.”[14]

There actions would literally know no shame or level of deplorability, all is fair in War and love, as the saying goes and these men seem to take these ideas quite seriously. They would come to use the Red Cross as a means to spread their own ideas and funding to get the end results that they envisioned by the Wars end. As quoted in Suttons book

“The Red Cross was unable to cope with the demands of World War I and in effect was

taken over by these New York bankers. According to John Foster Dulles, these businessmen “viewed the American Red Cross as a virtual arm of government, they envisaged making an incalculable contribution to the winning of the war.”1 In so doing they made a mockery of the Red Cross motto: “Neutrality and Humanity.”

In exchange for raising funds, Wall Street asked for the Red Cross War Council; and on the recommendation of Cleveland H. Dodge, one of Woodrow Wilson’s financial backers, Henry P. Davison, a partner in J.P. Morgan Company, became chairman.[15]

The world would be inundated with Capitalist vs. Communist propaganda but in truth the high level Wall Street financiers would be laughing about such a dichotomy. They were actually moving very much in tandem with the financiers leading the way. There is no bourgeoisie and proletariat separation in so much as there is the financiers and the finances. The revolutions could have never happened without someone pulling the strings and it is about time we realized this uncommon truth.

At the time when communism seem to take over as the fully function leadership of Russia they would become the first nation in history to declare anti-Semitism a crime. It would be the first time that a nation would deem it necessary for holding some type of racist views towards Jewish peoples. The reasoning can be described that “Soviet officials apparently regarded such measures as indispensable. Based on careful observation during a lengthy stay in Russia, American-Jewish scholar Frank Golder reported in 1925 that “because so many of the Soviet leaders are Jews anti-Semitism is gaining [in Russia], particularly in the army [and] among the old and new intelligentsia who are being crowded for positions by the sons of Israel.”[16]

During the time well revolution was casting a shadow over Russia British Oligarchy was already positioning itself within Palestine to render it as a Jewish home to further their aims. This was also following a series of events that would take place were Freemasonry and Bolsheviks revolutionaries were described as causing many of the woes that occurred throughout Europe. From the end of the 19th Century into the early stages of the 20th there would be multiple assassinations that would take place getting rid of many of the old rulers in Europe. A series of assassinations were committed (1881-1914) to advance ILLUMINATI war objectives, the most critical were: Czar Alexander II (“Little Father”) Russia, in 1881; the

Empress of Austria, in 1893; King Humbert of Italy in 1900; U.S. President McKinley in 1901; Grand Duke Sergius of Russia in 1905; Premier, V. von Plehve, Russia, in 1905; Premier, Peter A. Stolypin, Russia, in 1911; King Carlos and the Crown Prince of Portugal in 1908; Archduke Ferdinand and Duchess, Austria in 1914. All of these murders, and many more, are traceable to Bolshevism, Freemasonry (Masons of the Grand Orient) and others.

ILLUMINATI sponsored terror groups. At the Austrian Military Trial (10-12-14), investigating the murder of the Archduke, the prosecutor questioned Cabrinovic — the assassin who threw the first bomb — he replied:

“Freemasonry had to do with it because it strengthened my intentions. In Freemasonry it is permitted to kill… Freemasonry had condemned the Archduke to death more than a year before. CABRINOVIC, Freemason, Serb.[17]

This is again backed up that the Archduke had been set up for assassination over a

year before his death when it was described that “The Archduke knew quite well that the risk of an attempt on his life was imminent. A year before the war he had informed me that the Freemasons had resolved his death.”

COUNT CZERNIN, In the World War.

Throughout this period the Zionist position would move to an entirely nationalistic ideology of a home land for the Jewish people and their defense against anti-Semitism was almost none existent. It could even be said that they preferred a certain level of anti-Semitism because without it they would have no counterpart of which to push for a full Jewish homeland. The essentials of Zionist doctrine on anti-Semitism were laid down well before the Holocaust: anti-Semitism was inevitable and could not be fought; the solution was the emigration of unwanted Jews to a Jewish state-in-the-making. The inability of the Zionist movement to take Palestine militarily compelled it to look for imperial patronage, which it expected to be motivated by anti-Semitism to some degree.[18]

In fact to a certain degree it can be said that there was a movement to downplay the role of anti-Semitism coming to be. As a strategic plot this would serve to show the world that there was no other choice then to delegate to the Jewish people a homeland. Weizmann, the prestigious scientist and President of the WZO, who was well connected in London, did next to nothing for German Jewry. He had never liked them, nor did he have any sympathy for their defense efforts against anti-Semitism. As early as 18 March 1912 he had actually been brazen enough to tell a Berlin audience: “that ‘each country can absorb only a limited number of Jews, if she doesn’t want disorders in her stomach. Germany already has too many Jews.’61 in his chat with Balfour, in 1914; he went further, telling him that ‘we too are in agreement with the cultural anti-Semites, in so far as we believed that Germans of the Mosaic faith are an undesirable, demoralizing phenomena’[19]

Well the shift was coming through in the Zionist organizations to a position of none action in Germany for the defense of there people and the Russian Bolsheviks taking full hold the British were planting there position as well in Palestine. The British Israelites would move to homogenize their groups into one faction when in 1919, the 40-odd British Israelite organizations were consolidated into the British Israel World Federation (BIWF), which, today, spans the British Empire and permeates the United States. The first patrons of the BIWF were the Maradvancechioness of Headfort and Adm. Sir Richard Peirse. This consolidation followed two developments that were the work of British leaders who had been influenced by British Israelism. The first was the 1917 conquest of Palestine and entry into Jerusalem by Field Marshal Lord Allenby, which was intended to achieve a Palestinian Mandate for the British Empire at the Versailles Peace Conference. The second, which sought to give an “imaginative” purpose to a British mandate, was the Balfour Declaration “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.” The Balfour Declaration was nowhere more joyously celebrated than in the Darbyite and British Israelite congregations in England and America. But, the joy had little to do with the Jewish people; indeed, many of the celebrants were anti-Semites who would soon join the revived Ku Klux Klan. The issue was the final fulfillment of the Biblical prophesy and, then, the end of the world.[20]

Despite history books holding that the British were helping the Zionist groups so as to bring America into the war and also even in some cases you will read that it was to the British own gain to have a friend and ally in the region, you will undoubtedly never find in one history book the idea of British Israelism as a mode for their actions. I ask “When in the course of history has the British Oligarchy acted in good faith towards another peoples simply for its own benevolence?” When seeing the moves of the early twentieth century to push the Jewish people into Palestine and knowing the underlying goals of those at the top through their own writings, it is nothing more then a very corrupt thing being done and the Jewish people are merely characters playing out a role that the anti-Semitic leadership wishes to be seen played out. Make no mistake about it, the reasons for there actions are for the premillenial dispensationalist prophetic ideas and within that prophecy the Jews are not the real divine peoples. According to their beliefs the lost 10 tribes of Israel have descended into Great Britain and America. To the ones that understand the true intent they know full well it is nonsense as well. They use it for a rationalization of there own sick twisted actions and as you will see, it will continue into the second World War becoming yet another stage act to be played out.

[1] Thompson, Scott and Minnicino, Michael. “British Israelites and Empire Executive Intelligence Review“. 24. 46 (1997), 36-42,

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid

[4] Thompson, Scott and Minnicino, Michael. “British Israelites and EmpireExecutive Intelligence Review“. 24. 46 (1997), 36-42,

[5] Herzl,Theodor. The Jewish State.. Germany: American Zionist Emergency Council, 1946.

[6] Brenner ,Lenni. Zionism in the Age of the Dictators. AARGH internet reprint 2004 ed. Croom Helm London and Cabrara. Westport, Conneticut: Lawrence Hill, 1983

[7] Weber, Mark. “The Jewish Role in the Bolsheviks Revolution and Russia’s Early Soviet RegimeAssessing the Grime Legacy of Soviet Communism“. 14. 1 (1994

[8] Ibid

[9] Ibid

[10] Zionism and Russia

[11] Weber, Mark. “The Jewish Role in the Bolsheviks Revolution and Russia’s Early Soviet RegimeAssessing the Grime Legacy of Soviet Communism“. 14. 1 (1994)

[12] Sutton, Anthony C. Wall Street and the Bolsheviks Revolution. United States: Studies in Reformed Theology, 2001.

[13] Ibid. (pgs 21-23)

[14] Ibid. (pgs26-28)

[15] Ibid (pg 29)

[16] Ibid.

[17] Von Brunn,James W.. KILL THE BEST GENTILES!” or “Tob Shebbe Goyim Harog!” (THE TALMUD: Sanhedrin 59) . First ed. The Racialist Guide for the Preservation and Nurture of the White Gene Pool. Easton, Maryland: Holy Western Empire, 2002.


[18] Brenner, Lenni. Zionism in the Age of the Dictators. AARGH internet reprint 2004 ed. Croom Helm London and Cabrara. Westport, Conneticut: Lawrence Hill, 1983

[19] Ibid.

[20] Thompson, Scott and Minnicino, Michael. “British Israelites and EmpireExecutive Intelligence Review“. 24. 46 (1997), 36-42, 

Click here for part 3

Original artikel:

Dit bericht is geplaatst in Veritas Nieuws Service met de tags , . Bookmark de permalink.

2 reacties op Veritas News – THE CULT OF ZION – Pt. 2 – British Israelism/Christian Identity, Mormonism, and the Bolsheviks

  1. Veritas News – THE CULT OF ZION – Pt. 2 – British Israelism/Christian Identity, Mormonism, and the Bolsheviks | I was suggested this website by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my difficulty. You’re incredible! Thanks! your article about Veritas News – THE CULT OF ZION – Pt. 2 – British Israelism/Christian Identity, Mormonism, and the Bolsheviks | Best Regards Agata Andy

Geef een reactie

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *