Veritas News – THE CULT OF ZION: Pt. 3 – Holocaust

Click here for part 1

Veritas News Service Report

by: Todd Stevens



Pt. 3 – Holocaust

What did it mean to be Jewish before the holocaust? For instance, before Israel and living as a minority? For centuries, Jewish heritage was proudly contained in their stories, culture, and religion. Wherever they lived, they were persecuted and scapegoated for their differences. What made them visibly different was that they held on so tightly to their traditions and their culture, and would not compromise certain aspects of it for acceptance. This has often made Jews a prime target for racism. This even happens today with other groups that hold on to their culture. Chinese and Mexican people are regularly mocked for this.

Over the last hundred years at most, what it means to be Jewish has shifted from a Hebrew person or another following the Hebrew religion, to being Hebrew and having a personal connection to the holocaust/ Israel. This is because of a number of factors, but mainly because of what an atrocity the holocaust was. It was such a spectacle of human brutality and suffering that any victims of a ‘holocaust’ would have to feel united over it.

Another factor in this is the immense amount of Hollywood films and teachings that we are bombarded with. It is a fact that during our earliest years of education we are exposed to visions of mass extermination of Jews by Nazis in “concentration camps”, and other horror stories of torture. A quite obvious example of this is that in many public schools in California it is a part of the curriculum to go to the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles at some point, usually in 6th grade. Despite the fact that there are other exhibits, the main one is the holocaust. As a child without a counter balance to the argument, one will pretty much believe what the teacher and orator of the museum say just because they say it. Not to mention the vast amounts of Hitler and holocaust documentaries that come on the “History” channel every year. In fact, most people would say that Hitler’s main goal was the extermination of the Jews, rather than National Socialism, which is what Nazi means.

You should know that it is illegal in many countries to question the events of the holocaust as they are presented by the mainstream world view. Here in America, although free speech is legal, it is public suicide to say anything against the state of Israel or the holocaust. Many people have suffered and been thrown in jail or even killed just for publishing writing that challenges official history. If this doesn’t happen they are usually called Neo-Nazi’s or Anti-Semites to the point where they lose their jobs (if they are lucky). Questioners are always discredited to the point of being demonized without ever having their evidence actually examined. I will be the first to admit that I myself have found it hard to even research the topic of the holocaust, and had to read through some things that I would never endorse or promote in order to do even the most basic of investigations. Yes, many revisionists are Nazis. However, it should not be assumed that the only people out there with a revisionist opinion are racist. There are some who are quite neutral. If you look, there are some who discuss these possibilities and don’t endorse any type of anti-Semitic or apologist views. Regardless, every single revisionist is called anti-Semitic or Neo-Nazi, whether they are, or not. The one trait they all do share is a request for open debate, and in a free society, that right must be preserved for all.

The fear, of course, is that if the “holocaust denier” has validity, they could also be right about racism toward Jews, or about National Socialism, or about any aspect of Nazi ideology. Of course, this is ridiculous. Just because a certain argument or fact may have validity, doesn’t mean that any other aspect of one’s position is right or wrong. Facts are facts. In light of these sensitivities, let us all remember that the everyday Jewish people have nothing to do with the holocaust. Everyday people didn’t start it, didn’t perpetrate it, and they didn’t promote it. It was the educators, the historians, and of course the Zionists.

Granted, if the holocaust was a hoax, it would take away some of the horrific aspects that demonize Hitler. However, Hitler is still the racist dictator that we all know and hate. It is a fact that Hitler and the Nazis singled out the Jews and others for slander, economic persecution, abuse, and yes, imprisonment without charge. People were afraid their own family would turn them in. These events should never be forgotten and are despicable.

Also, if the holocaust was a hoax, it also does not paint a prettier picture of the suffering at the camps. People were forcefully removed from their homes, separated from their families, and put into forced labor; sometimes not only adults but even children being outright worked to death. Many people died in the camps from basic abuse. This is never justifiable, and should not be forgiven or even thought of as anything less than a human atrocity.

We should also remember that Hitler was funded by the same people who were funding Trotsky and the Bolsheviks. (See Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Anthony Sutton) As well, it was from Hitler’s occult connections with the Thule Society that he got his Aryan Blavatskian ideology of a superior race, and those ideas are alive, thriving, and a threat.

The intent of this article is not to incite racism, for I believe that we are all created equal, brothers and sisters of the human family. I do not promote socialism, for I believe in our Constitution, which protects all of our individual rights. My only hope here is to raise enough questions in the reader to incite the will to either prove this research wrong, or to at least go out and travel your own path to your own conclusion on this subject matter.

And so, the glaring question remains: what would happen if we put the holocaust to the test? What would it mean to the Jewish people if the holocaust were a hoax? To me, it could very well be the most freeing thing to happen to the Jews since the end of WWII…


Some of the simplest myths to dispel outright before we move onto the gas chambers themselves would be the atrocity stories: human lampshades, shrunken heads, human soap, shower head gassings, and certain experiments, etc. The atrocity stories have been proven to be myth not by Revisionist Historians but by highly accredited historians such as Raul Hilberg (The Destruction of the European Jew) and Deborah Lipstadt. As Deborah Lipstadt stated in a response to these ideas, “The fact is that the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews or for that matter anyone else, for the production of soap. The soap rumor was prevalent both during and after the war. It may have had its origin in the cadaver factory atrocity story that came out of World War I. The letters ‘RJF’ probably stood for the name of the factory that produced the soap. The soap rumor was thoroughly investigated after the war and proved to be untrue.”[1] Despite this fact, Simon Wiesenthal and Elie Wiesel continue to tell these stories as if they are some kind of truth. Even the accredited political science teacher Norman Finkelstein refers to Elie Wiesel “..mistifying the holocaust to the point of making it unknowable” and in interviews has regarded this type of fictionalized version of history as being an ideological weapon pretending to be history. Another group that perpetuates these claims is the Shoah Foundation started by Steven Spielberg. The foundation created a video log of survivor stories that record their experiences at the concentration camps. This is noble idea except the way that they do it is completely deceptive. In general they choose the most horrific stories they can find to post on the front, despite the fact that many of the survivors tell stories of being in orchestras, having currency, having their own gardens, and playing soccer. If one wanted to look further into these claims there is great documentary on this deception called The Last Days of the Big Lie. (

It is important to understand these false claims coming out at the end of WWII because it shows that over time history is being revised. Things that were once true can all of the sudden be shown to have been minor inaccuracies or outright lies. This is especially the case with eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimony can always be refuted when shown to not correspond with the documentation and forensic evidence. It should be noted that much of the holocaust itself comes from eyewitness testimony and confessions that were forced out of people.


Propaganda picture of Germans as Huns Bayoneting babies!

The story that Deborah Lipstadt referred to has origins and comes not only from WWII but has origins in some of the lies and propaganda that was coming out of the WWI. To help gain wartime favor for the war, Woodrow Wilson passed Executive Order 2594  to established the Committee on Public Information to propagandize Americans into supporting U.S. entry into the war.

“Germans were referred to collectively as the ‘Hun’ and the ‘Prussian Python.’ Political cartoons and posters conveyed the image of a raging beast ready to devour innocent women and children. Earlier British propaganda was released accusing German soldiers of bayoneting Belgian babies as they marched through that neutral country.”

Also, the Allies would spread propaganda to help make soldiers feel that their enemy was ruthless and they had the right to kill and treat them with any type of force necessary: ‘To make armies go on killing one another it is necessary to invent lies about the enemy’. These atrocity stories were then fed to newspapers that were quite willing to publish them. British newspapers accused German soldiers of a series of crimes including: gouging out the eyes of civilians, cutting off the hands of teenage boys, raping and sexually mutilating women, giving children hand grenades to play with, bayoneting babies and the crucifixion of captured soldiers.”[1]

The soap story first appeared in a London Times article in April 17, 1917 and stated that: “The bodies are transported on this endless chain into a long, narrow compartment, where they pass through a bath which disinfects them. They then go through a drying chamber, and finally are automatically carried into a digester or great cauldron, in which they are dropped by an apparatus which detaches them from the chain. In the digester they remain from six to eight hours, and are treated by steam, which breaks them up while they are slowly stirred by the machinery.”

“From this treatment results several products. The fats are broken up into stearin, a form of tallow, and oils, which require redistilling before they can be used. The process of distillation is carried out by boiling the oil with carbonate of soda, and some of the by-products resulting from this are used by German soap makers. The oil distillery and refinery lie in the southeastern corner of the works. The refined oil is sent out in small casks like those used for petroleum, and is of yellowish brown color.”[2]

These along with lampshades, tattooed skin samples, and shrunken heads would later prove to be nothing but atrocity stories, despite the horrific descriptions about how the events took place. What imagination and deception it takes to describe people in such a horrific manner.

[2] Ibid.

Propaganda shown at Buchenwald where there are no gas chambers

Close up of the shrunken heads at Buchenwald


The six million number that has been reported and repeated for at least fifty years has already been revised by Auschwitz holocaust historians themselves, when, in 1988, they revised the number down from 4.1 million to 1.5 million deaths at Auschwitz. This number would again be revised by Franciszek Piper in the book Anatomy of Auschwitz Death Camp. On page three it describes that the official number is now 1.1 million, yet another reduction because of revisionist scrutiny at the time. This is a total reduction of 3 million people. Now, if we took this number alone, the official number would be 3 million people killed in the holocaust. So why do history books at all levels of school not reflect this? Even if this was the only revision that was ever made, it should at least be reflected in our children’s education. However this is not the only possible revision.

If we move on and attempt to discover the origins of the 6 million number we must look at how it was gathered and how reliable the number is in the first place. In Arthur Butz’s The Hoax of the 20th Century we see

Conflicting Census numbers:

Table 3: Eastern European Jewish

population (est.)

COUNTRY                                       1938                        1948

Bulgaria                                            48,398                   46,500

Hungary                                           444,567                 180,000

Poland                                              3,113,900              105,000

Romania                                           900,000                 430,000

USSR                                               3,273,047              2,032,500

TOTALS                                          7,779,912              2,794,000

The claimed Jewish loss for Eastern Europe is thus 4,985,912. The figure for the USSR includes the three Baltic countries and the Jews of Soviet Asia.

It is possible to reinforce our objection on this all important point, and simultaneously deal with a reservation that the reader may have: it would appear excessively brazen to claim the virtual disappearance of Polish Jewry if such had not been essentially or approximately the case, or if something like that had not happened. This seems a valid reservation but one must recall that much of the territory that was considered Polish in 1939 was Soviet by 1945. It was possible for Polish Jewry to virtually disappear if, during the 1939-1941 Russian occupation of Eastern Poland, the Soviets had dispersed large numbers of Polish Jews into the Soviet Union, and if, during 1941-1944, the Germans had concentrated Polish Jews eastwards, with the Soviet Union ultimately absorbing many of these Jews into the Soviet Union, with those who did not wish to remain in the Soviet Union emigrating, mainly to Palestine and the US. (Butz 35)

A key point to the numbers that are estimated is that the immigration numbers are not usually reflected in the story of the holocaust. It is dubious to say the least that anyone could say for certainty that exactly 6 million Jews were killed. We are also taking total deaths at the camps without ever seeing how many were not Jews. At best, the number itself is wholly symbolic in nature and does not represent actual historic records.

Another typical problem for demographic numbers, specifically for the Jewish population, is what actually defined a Jew at the time. A person could be of Hebrew descent but not practice Judaic religion. On the other hand, one could be a different race and at the same time claim to be Jewish and  practice Judaism. This is especially precarious, given the mass movement of populations in Europe during the war,  the movement of borders and the transfer of control in nations during WWI and II. So, figures can be highly dubious when trying to discover true demographics of the time. For a closer estimation of the numbers of Jewish populations in the region, Richard Harwood in Did 6 Million Really Die writes, “What reliable statistics there are, especially those relating to emigration, are sufficient to show that not a fraction of six million Jews could have been exterminated… According to Chambers Encyclopedia the total number of Jews living in pre-war Europe was 6,500,000. Quite clearly, this would mean that almost the entire number was exterminated. But the Baseler Nachrichten, a neutral Swiss publication employing available Jewish statistical data, establishes that between 1933 and 1945, 1,500,000 Jews emigrated to Britain, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Australia, China, India, Palestine and the United States. This is confirmed by the Jewish journalist Bruno Blau, who cites the same figure in the New York Jewish paper Aufbau, August 13th, 1948. Of these emigrants, approximately 400,000 came from Germany before September 1939. This is acknowledged by the World Jewish Congress in its publication Unity in Dispersion (p. 377), which states that: “The majority of the German Jews succeeded in leaving Germany before the war broke out.” In addition to the German Jews, 220,000 of the total 280,000 Austrian Jews had emigrated by September, 1939, while from March 1939 onwards the Institute for Jewish Emigration in Prague had secured the emigration of 260,000 Jews from former Czechoslovakia. In all, only 360,000 Jews remained in Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia after September 1939. From Poland, an estimated 500,000 had emigrated prior to the outbreak of war. These figures mean that the number of Jewish emigrants from other European countries (France, the Netherlands, Italy, the countries of Eastern Europe etc.) was approximately 120,000. This exodus of Jews before and during hostilities, therefore, reduces the number of Jews in Europe to approximately 5,000,000. In addition to these emigrants, we must also include the number of Jews who fled to the Soviet Union after 1939, and who were later evacuated beyond reach of the German invaders. It will be shown below that the majority of these, about 1,250,000, were migrants from Poland. But apart from Poland, Reitlinger admits that 300,000 other European Jews slipped into Soviet territory between 1939 and 1941. This brings the total of Jewish emigrants to the Soviet Union to about 1,550,000. In Colliers magazine, June 9th, 1945, Freiling Foster, writing of the Jews in Russia, explained that “2,200,000 have migrated to the Soviet Union since 1939 to escape from the Nazis,” but our lower estimates probably more accurate. Jewish migration to the Soviet Union, therefore, reduces the number of Jews within the sphere of German occupation to around 3 1/2 million, approximately 3,450,000. From these should be deducted those Jews living in neutral European countries who escaped the consequences of the war. According to the 1942 World Almanac (p. 594), the number of Jews living in Gibraltar, Britain, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ireland and Turkey was 413,128.” (Harwood pg 9)


Arthur Butz, in his book The Hoax of the 20th Century, outlines the “Historical-Political” approach. He not only shows the policies of Germany in making a case for the extermination or lack thereof, but also outlines the American/Washington intent of positioning opinion against the Nazis and trying them at Nuremberg. I will reiterate some of his points, but will also add in Russia’s propagandizing during the war adding in yet another point of view that might bring forth some insight as to what occurred during this time.

The Americans brought the camp under control and it served, as we have seen, as an American camp and center of “war crimes trials.” An American lawyer, Stephen S. Pinter, who was stationed there and evidently disapproved of what had been carried out there in the name of the United States, wrote in 1959:

“I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a US War Department Attorney, and can state that there was no gas chamber at Dachau. What was shown to visitors and sightseers there and erroneously described as a gas chamber, was a crematory. Nor was there a gas chamber in any of the other concentration camps in Germany. We were told that there was a gas chamber at Auschwitz, but since that was in the Russian zone of occupation, we were not permitted to investigate, since the Russians would not permit it.

[…] uses the old propaganda myth that millions of Jews were killed by the national socialists. From what I was able to determine during six postwar years in Germany and Austria, there were a number of Jews killed, but the figure of a million was certainly never reached, I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of concentration camps in Germany and Austria, and consider myself as well qualified as any man on this subject.”(Butz pg74)

This is essentially the Dachau myth as it stood in the summer of 1973: the information given the visiting tourist at Dachau correctly identified the disinfection room as such, without any attempt to represent it as a gas chamber for exterminating people. In regard to the shower bath the leaflet explained that

“This gas chamber, camouflaged as a shower room, was not used. The prisoners selected for ‘gassing’ were transported from Dachau to the Hartheim Castle, near Linz (Austria) or to other camps.”(Butz pg 74)

Please note these two very important points. First, Dachau, which was regarded as a ‘death’ camp until the 1960’s, was reported to have gas chambers, even though it is now a historical fact that there were no gas chambers in Germany proper. Second, Russia would not allow American investigators into the camps in Poland and records of the camps were not examined until the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989. The main reports from Polish camps were from Soviet Russia, which at the time was still ruled by Stalin. Also, as you will remember from the last installment, Russia was one of the first nations to make anti-Semitism a crime. So, even if someone wanted to challenge the official Soviet propaganda story, they couldn’t because they would be thrown in jail. This from a regime that would itself kill over 20 million people during the war time years.

Now for the gas chambers. We will specifically be focusing on the ‘death’ camps in Poland, because as a matter of recorded history, none of the camps in Germany are now regarded as ‘death’ camps. Despite the fact that initial reports concluded that these were also ‘death’ camps,  it would later be changed and not made into the headline news it should have been. The map below shows the official sites of the camps.

As you can see, the camps still considered death camps are all in the Poland region. We will mostly be showing how Auschwitz and to some extent Treblinka have considerable evidence to negate the official story that gas chambers were used as a means of mass extermination on the Jews or any other peoples at the camp.


In the official historical teachings it is said that Auschwitz-Birkenau was set up to house Polish prisoners of war because of the small amount of size of the existing prisons. In 1942 it developed into a ‘death’ camp where prisoners were forced into a chamber, Zyklon-B (pesticide) was dropped into the room, filling it with cyanide gas and killing the people in a matter of 20 to 30 minutes. The bodies would be taken into crematoriums and burned to eliminate the evidence. Another claim is that the bodies were stacked and burned using a type of petroleum byproduct to ignite the bodies. Given the immense amount of information that would have to be conveyed in such a complex topic it would be much wiser to focus in on some of the logical fallacies in the hopes that it would push the reader to do their own investigation on the subject.

Some of the logical fallacies that can be shown in the argument for the extermination theory are the pure numbers of the incident. From orthodox historical perspectives you will get a range of 3-5 cremation centers at Auschwitz so let’s just say 4 crematoriums with 4 cremators in each of them. In wondering this you would have to ask how many bodies could be cremated in a crematorium activating at full capacity for 24 hours a day? According to three different sources you see that “The casket or container is placed in the cremation chamber, where the temperature is raised to approximately 1400 degrees to 1800 degrees Fahrenheit. After approximately 2 to 2 1/2 hours, all organic matter is consumed by heat or evaporation,” (  and in Wikipedia you will read “The process usually takes 90 minutes to two hours, with larger bodies taking longer time.” In one more report from the Cremation Coaching Center ( you will read that “First, let’s assume that by “cremation time,” we mean the time it takes to physically reduce the body and casket or container. In this assumption we are not including the pre-heating of the afterburner chamber, which can add anywhere from 20 minutes to 60 minutes to the total processing time, depending on the state environmental requirements.

The factors that affect cremation time are the size of the body (weight), the percentage of body fat to lean tissue or muscle, the type of container or casket, the performance standards of the cremation equipment, and whether it is the first cremation of the day, the second, and the third and so on. Some operators believe that the medical history of the deceased and type of treatment can also affect the time it takes to cremate.

As a result, actual cremation times vary from 60 minutes to more than 5 hours. In the cremation profession, it is widely stated that it takes about 2 hours to cremate an average body of 150 pounds in a cardboard cremation container.” So with this information you could assume that it will take 2 to 3 hours to cremate a body. If the operations were going at full capacity for 24 hours a day 365 days a year burning body’s you would get a table similar to this.

24 divided by 2.5 hours per body = 9.6 body’s per day

9.6 bodies multiplied by 365 days a year = 3504

3504 bodies multiplied by 16 (high estimate) crematoriums = 56,064

56,064 multiplied by 4 years = 224,256 deaths and cremations.

You could make the argument that the Nazis didn’t care about the bodies of the Jews so it didn’t have to be a typical cremation. Even given an argument of this type, the amount of bodies that would have to have been cremated and the standard estimated time poses a huge task that would have to be undertaken. If this were so, I don’t think that the Nazis could have been as quiet about such an operation.

This is also assuming that all crematoriums are active everyday at full capacity with no down time whatsoever– a literal death machine. What are the official numbers of deaths at Auschwitz? It is 1.5 million through gassing and cremation. To get a number of 1.5 million, the Nazis at Auschwitz would have had to been gassing and cremating bodies at a rate of 65 bodies per cremator per day. That is 7280 per week. I find this to be absolutely fantastical thinking. There is almost no logical way the Nazis could have done this. They would have had to burn 3 bodies every hour. Furthering this idea the ‘official’ historian Yisrael Gutman, the chairman of Yad Vashem’s Academic Committee, writes “In early 1942, two peasant cottages near Birkenau whose inhabitants had been evicted, began functioning as provisional gas chambers. About 2,000 persons could be squeezed into them at one time. In this phase of the operation, the gas victims were Jews brought in transports from Upper Silesia and Slovakia. Then, from March 1943 on, four gas chambers and crematoria, designed and built specifically for mass murder by German engineers and companies, were in operation at the Birkenau camp. At their top capacity, these installations could ‘process’ 4,416 victims in 24 hours.” (Anatomy of Auschwitz Death Camps, pg. 30). So although it might be hard to believe some of the smaller scale numbers, you are expected to believe these gas chamber crematoriums operated at about four times the capacity of know crematoriums.  This is not counting gassing time, transport time, cleaning, delousing, undressing, or even the bone crushing that would have had to occur afterwards.  This figure is a physical impossibility even if the Germans, who had some of the best engineers at the time, had developed something that would have the capacity to pull off such a goal, while at the same time fighting a war on multiple fronts.

Regarding the official numbers, one thing that should be stated is that many historians like to point to the figures by Rudolf Hoss at the Nuremberg trials and the National Tribunal of Poland. At Nuremberg, he quoted the number of deaths at Auschwitz as 2.5 million from gassings and 500,000 from starvation and disease. Then he later retracted these statements and said that he got this information from Adolf Eichmann and that the real number was closer to 1.13 million.  He changed his story again at the National Tribunal in Poland, where he stated that the total was over 3 million deaths. The point of this is that the original Soviet numbers and Nazi officers’ testimony should not be used as a viable source of total figures. If we take what the Nazi officers said at face value, then we would have to conclude that the gassings were either not taking place at all or they were too small to notice, because most of those who were interrogated denied they knew any type of mass extermination was occurring.

So, even the 1.5 million number that is reported by Auschwitz does not make logical sense, even if we suppose that the gas chambers existed.  Then at the very least this number should be dropped or at least disputed further.


These are the fumigation systems used at Dachau which at one point were called gas chambers, but were determined not to be and are now displayed as fumigation areas.

In Germany, Poland and in the European region the spread of disease through rodents and lice was rampant at the time. When prisoners were transferred from the ghettos and countrysides, it was necessary to delouse them to ensure the spread of typhus ( would not become epidemic throughout the camps. This is why the prisoners would be stripped and have their clothing removed– to get rid of the lice that carried typhus. When you see the mounds of clothing and stacks of Zyklon B canisters, this is generally the reason. Even Jean Claude Pressac, an orthodox historian, states in his book Operation and Techniques of the Gas Chambers that 95% of the Zyklon B was used for delousing. This raises  an  interesting question of why the Nazis would spend so much time, money, and effort to keep people alive when their ultimate goal was to exterminate them.

As you can see from the pictures above the doors in the pictures are fully sealed and there is a ventilation system to push in and remove the gas after the delousing was done. If you look at the Krema I bunker at Auschwitz, you will see some immediate flaws in design. In Carlos Mattogno’s book Auschwitz: Crematorium One, these supposed gas chambers at crematorium I (Krema I) and the claim that they once had hermetically sealed doors. “But then what happened to the two alleged gas-tight doors of the alleged homicidal gas-chamber? One of them – the one which separated the morgue from the furnace hall – is said to have been dismantled and temporarily replaced by a standard gas-tight air-raid shelter door like the two outer doors. The other, which separated the washing room from the mortuary room, was simply removed and substituted by an ordinary door. Needless to say, at the liberation of the camp not the slightest trace of the two gas-tight doors of the alleged homicidal gas chamber were found, and not a trace of them exists in the documentation of the Central Construction Office.” (Mattogno pg. 90).  This should be kept in mind well scanning the link below.


The room was not hermetically sealed in any way and the building itself does not contain proper ventilation to move the Zyklon B in and out of the chamber. In the Leuchter Report prepare for the trial of Ernst Zundel in Toronto it is stated that,  “the discoid’s, snippets or pellets had to be spread on the floor of the area to be fumigated or utilized in a chamber which circulated and heated the air within the chamber in excess of 78.3 degrees Fahrenheit (25.7 degrees Centigrade). If used in buildings, ships, or tents to fumigate trees and produce, the area must be heated to an excess of 78.3 degrees Fahrenheit temperature, the boiling point of HCN. Failure to do this will result in a much longer time to complete the fumigation. Fumigation takes a minimum of 24 to 48 hours. After the fumigation, the ventilation of the area must take a minimum of ten hours, depending on the location (and volume), or longer if the building has no windows or exhaust fans. The fumigated area must then be chemically tested for the presence of gas before entering. Gas masks are sometimes used, but are not safe and should not be used for more than ten (10) minutes. A complete chemical suit must be worn to prevent skin poisoning.” (Leuchter pg. 14)

This last line also raises some questions to the eye witness reports of the sonderkommandos. The sonderkommandos were Jews that were force to work in the crematoriums and supposedly helped with the moving of  gassing victims. Here is a picture from Wikipedia that states in the caption ’sonderkommandos in Auschwitz, 1944” and at the bottom it states, “A heap of bodies piled outdoors. Bodies were burned outdoors when the crematorium could not keep pace with the number of bodies to be burned. In the foreground are bodies ready to be thrown on the heap.” There is just one problem with this and the eye witness reports. You can’t move bodies that have just been gassed with cyanide without having some type of protection. If they had, there would have been no eyewitnesses to report this because they would be dead. Even today, when a person is gassed in a vacuum sealed room , ammonia and bleach must be used to clean the room afterwards so that the cyanide residue won’t kill anyone that comes in contact with it. 

Given this information, you could determine if dropping Zyklon B in a chamber would cause the expected chemical reaction given the temperature in the region. In Poland the average temperature is “..about 8?C/46?F and varies for the regions of Poland depending on height above sea level and distance from the Baltic Sea. In the summer months of June, July and August, showers alternate with dry, sunny weather and the temperature averages about 18?C/64?F; the maximum summer temperature is 40?C/104?F…The average temperature in January is about -4?C/25?F but it can fall as low as -35?C/-31?F.( Given the chemical criteria and the average temperature data,  it is obvious that only during the months of June, July, and August would this methodology have even the remotest chance of working.

Fred Leuchter also took samples from the walls in Kremas I and II. He took these to a lab in Massachusetts to have them analyzed for the trial of Ernst Zundel. Without telling the lab where these samples were from, it was determined from chemical analysis that the chambers contained no residual cyanide (Zyklon B) within the walls.

In the film Mr. Death: The Rise and Fall of Fred Leuchter, chemist James Roth from Alpha Analytical Laboratories states that he was told to go to the trial of Ernst Zundel to testify to the validity and results of the test samples. He had to do this because the Leuchter Report was not initially accepted as evidence and had to be attested to by witnesses. On the stand, he had reported to the validity of the results, but in the film itself Mr. Roth states, “I don’t think the Leuchter results have any meaning…there is nothing in those reports that says those surfaces were exposed or not. Hindsight being 20/20, the tests that were being conducted were not the proper ones to be used.” He goes on to explain that the cyanide would only attach to the surface. The tests were conducted by cutting up the samples and smashing them so that they could be mixed with concentrated sulfuric acid. If the tests were done inaccurately, it could be due to procedural error on the lab’s part because they were not told before hand that they were testing for cyanide in a wall sample.

Mr. Roth’s statements should be taken with a grain of salt because he is probably trying to distance himself from results that he doesn’t like and had to testify for. Also, if the test was done incorrectly, why did the control sample in the delousing chamber show off of the charts with regard to the amount of cyanide that was found within them? Furthermore, the walls of the delousing chambers have turned blue because of the massive amount of Zyklon B used in them, but you do not see this in any of the crematoriums.


If any of the rooms would show a large scale result, with respect to cyanide traces, you would think it would be Krema I because of how intact the building is. But there is virtually no trace of cyanide at all and certainly not enough to explain multiple gassings within the area. In fact, the reason for this might be that what we call Krema I now was turned into an air raid shelter by the Nazis in 1943. On November 16, 1943, the commander of the Auschwitz camp, SS Obersturmbannführer

Liebehenschel issued the following order regarding “Air-raid measures at garrison Auschwitz”:

“Upon advice of the competent superior authorities, the necessary air raid protection measures will now also be undertaken in the Auschwitz garrison area with immediate effect. In my quality as competent local air raid protection officer I have appointed SS-Untersturmführer Josten to be my permanent representative. I request all services to support SS-Untersturmführer Josten in every possible way.”

In the orthodox historian’s view they say that they were making the crematoriums into air raid shelters to hide what they had been doing. It would have to be up to the reader to decide what they would like to believe In so much as has been found thus far they have only found documentation that corresponds to the idea that it was made into an air raid shelter.  On November 2, 1944, Josten drew up an “explanatory report for conversion of the old crematorium into an air-raid shelter for the SS sickbay with an operating room in concentration camp Auschwitz O/S. BW 98M,” in which he described the work to be done:

“Conversion of the existing and available rooms of the old crematorium into an air-raid shelter for the SS sickbay with an operating room. The existing central walls and some partitions will be reinforced to 38 cm. Any other necessary partitions will be built. An emergency operating room, two gas-locks, two flushing toilets [78] and a water faucet in the operating room are to be installed because a water supply line is available and the sewage line can be extended. Heating will be by ovens.”

Regarding the time schedule, Josten adds:

“On account of its urgency, work has already started and will be completed within three weeks.”

What should be also noticed is that he called it a ’sickbay’ with an operating room, which would make sense if it was true that it was the morgue and the sickbay for infected prisoners and SS men. Again, some would rationalize that the Nazis are just good liars and were planning on covering it up unless they lost the war. This is more speculative than the Revisionist perspective and it should be those that say otherwise that must prove their points.

Here are the roof vents through which SS men are said to have thrown Zyklon B into the chambers. 

Zyklon B and cyanide gas are not something that you handle lightly. There needs to be proper ventilation or you will most likely end up killing yourself in the process of killing others. By comparison, look at the delousing chambers and see the difference from the pictures preceding this one.

Another problem is the fact that Auschwitz had a brothel, an orchestra, currency, and even a soccer field. Why would you attempt to exterminate people and give them the amenities needed for any type of enjoyment? It was a labor camp. This is the entirety of the truth. With the need for rubber, armament, and clothing for soldiers and prisoners and the labor needed to produce these, it makes more sense for the Reich to have used people in forced labor rather than to just kill them off. In truth, the majority of the deaths occurred in the camps because of Typhus.

This does not diminish the suffering of those that were forced to live through these human atrocities and it should not implicate the Jewish people in any way of a conspiracy. The everyday Jewish people that were forced into these camps were being put there to set up the state of Israel for Zionist and Dispensational beliefs. It would also lead to the use of the charge of anti-Semitism as a mode of silencing people any time they challenge the contemporary belief structures regarding what has been happening in Israel and with the holocaust itself.

Norman Finkelstein wrote in his book The holocaust Industry that “the Nazi holocaust is just about the only historical reference that resonates in a university classroom today. Polls show that many more Americans can identify the holocaust than Pearl Harbor or the atomic bombing of Japan.” (Finkelstein pg. 8). The holocaust itself was not the huge Hollywood style historical event that it is today. During the years following WWII, the holocaust was not taught as the one pinnacle point in WWII, but now you cannot even ask someone about the war without the holocaust being the focal point of conversation. As Mark Weber, the revisionist historian put it, “How many Germans died in World War II, how many Americans, how many Chinese? As time goes on, in America, you see the emphasis on one particular people almost to the exclusion of everyone else.”


In WWII, 407,316 Americans died; 26.6 million Soviets died; 5.3 million Germans died; between 5.6 and 5.8 Polish died; 6,850,000 Ukrainians died with 5,200,000 of those being civilian Soviet genocide; and 20 million Chinese died with 7 to 16 million of those being civilians killed in genocide.

It is my hope that the issue of the holocaust will be further examined and given at least an objective look without putting too much emotional attachment on the issue. It was a tragedy, one that shouldn’t be forgotten, but it should also be put into the context of these other tragedies. Why is it acceptable for us to forget about all the rest, while promoting one particular group of people? It might also come as a surprise that the ‘holocaust industry’, as Norman Finkelstein calls it, did not come into American consciousness until the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the war of 1973, also called the Yom Kippur War  by the Jewish people or the Ramadan War by Muslims. Finkelstein describes that “The holocaust industry sprung up only after Israel’s overwhelming display of military dominance and flourished amid extreme Israeli triumphalism.” The standard interpretative framework cannot explain these anomalies… Israel’s shocking initial reverses and substantial casualties during (and increasing international isolation after) the October 1973 Arab Israeli war — conventional accounts maintain – exacerbated American Jewish fears of Israel’s vulnerability. Accordingly, holocaust memory now moved center stage. Novick  reports: “Among American Jews . . . the situation of a vulnerable and isolated Israel came to be seen as terrifyingly similar to that of European Jewry thirty years earlier…. Talk of the holocaust not only ‘took off’ in America but became increasing [sic] institutionalized.” Yet Israel had edged close to the precipice and, in both relative and absolute terms, suffered many more casualties in the 1948 war than in 1973. True, except for its alliance with the US, Israel was out of favor internationally after the October 1973 war. In effect the holocaust became a political tool to be used by certain organizations to further their own agendas by the baiting of the sheeple to follow their lead. The holocaust would not only take on the role of being a political tool but in a sense has become a holy idea within itself. I have heard it described that the holocaust has even taken the place of some Jewish ideology, in certain circles, at the detriment of original Hebrew traditions. Not only Jews but many Christians identify with the holocaust and Israel to the point of weaving it into the spiritual fabric of their existence. In the grand scheme of things, it is a relatively new phenomenon and its origins and events should continue to be examined.

The answer to why the holocaust became an industry within itself might lie in the B’nai B’rith, ADL, JDL, AIPAC, and Christian Zionist organizations that promote the end of free speech, as well as, the certain dispensationalists who wish nothing more then to see the Middle East go up into flames, even at the detriment of the Jews.

This will be covered in further installments.

For further information on this topic see the bibliography for writing on the subject and here are some links to films that will spark intrigue.

David Cole at Auschwitz

embedded by Embedded Video

holocaust Revisionism for Beginners

embedded by Embedded Video


Bibliography thus far (will be expanded as installments occur). 

Click here for part 4

Original artikel:

Dit bericht is geplaatst in Veritas Nieuws Service. Bookmark de permalink.

Één reactie op Veritas News – THE CULT OF ZION: Pt. 3 – Holocaust

  1. Pingback: Veritas News – THE CULT OF ZION – Pt. 2 – British Israelism/Christian Identity, Mormonism, and the Bolsheviks |

Geef een reactie

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *